Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts

Thursday, 22 October 2015

"Tawassul" from the perspective of Quran, Sunnah and Scholars [Part 1]

Tawassul is one of the most important dispute points among Muslims which has caused many bloodsheds. The oppositions of Tawassul are called Wahhabi who are the followers of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab. In this series, we are going to prove that the opinion of Wahhabiis on Tawassul is against Quran and Sunnah and show that unlike Wahhabism, Sunni school believes in Tawassul. So, first we introduce the views of Wahhabism on Tawassul and in the future posts, we will analyze and criticize their views.


The opinion of Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab on Tawassul and Ithtiqasah (kind of Supplication):

The book of Al-Durar Al-Sunnia fe Al-Jawba Al-Najdia , vol. 1, the book of Al-Aqaed , page 144:

"What we deny and oppose and because of which consider Muslims as infidels, is that if a person calls one of the prophets (e.g. Moses, Jesus pbut) or calls one of the angels (e.g. Gabriel, Michael) or performs a scarification or makes a Nadhr (Vow) or Itikaf besides the grave of prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and prays in that place and ask the prophet his/her needs, etc. This is the paganism that Quraish used to do before Islam and this is why the prophet fought Quraish."


Ref: Al-'asemi Al-Najdi Al-Qahtani, Abdul Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Qasim, Al-Durar Al-Sunnia fe Al-Jawba Al-Najdia , vol. 1, the book of Al-Aqaed, page 144
So in the opinion of Wahhabiis, if somebody performs Tawassul or Ithtiqasah to one of the prophets or angels, he/she is an infidel and has to be killed.

Thursday, 10 September 2015

Age of Ummul Momineen Aisha at time of marriage with Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)

Before looking at the original problem of age of Ummul Momineen Aisha let us clarify what really was the year in which Holy Prophet (PBUH) married Ummul Momineen Aisha so that it may be easier to conclude about what was the age of Ummul Momineen Aisha at the time of marriage with Holy Prophet (PBUH).
 

Muhammad Ibne Ismail Bukhari has narrated in Sahih Bukhari from Ummul Momineen Aisha herself that Holy Prophet (PBUH) married Ummul Momineen Aisha three years after the death of his first wife, Ummul Momineen Khadija:
I did not feel jealous of any woman as much as I did of Ummul Momineen Khadijah because Allah's Messenger used to mention her very often. He married me after three years of her death, and his Lord (or Gabriel) ordered him to give her the good news of having a palace of reed in Paradise.

Sahih al-Bukhari hadith #3817
http://sunnah.com/bukhari/63/43


Sunday, 24 May 2015

The horns of the Satan

The devilry anticipated by the prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessing be Upon Him)
Cartoon by MohammadReza Kordian

In 1157 AH (1744 CE) Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab made Bay'ah (oath of allegiance) with Muhammad ibn Sa'ud where it was agreed to hold the political power in the hands of the clan of Aal al-Saud (House of Saud, Royal family) and the religious leadership in the hands of the clan of Aal al-Sheikh (Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and his generations) and this power division has been kept until now. This event (the oath) is written in the book of Unwan al-Majd fe Tarikh al-Najd, Vol. 1, Page 41 , which was written and printed in Saudi Arabia.



Let's have a look at the origin of these two clans.

The origin of Al-Saud

The book titled Tarikh al-Bilad al-Arabia al-Saudia by al-Ostaz al-Doctur Munir al-Ijlani , the first chapter named 'al-Daulate al-Saudia al-Awla' and the first section, 'the tradition of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Da'wa and tradition of Muhammad ibn Saud wa Haruba' is a very reliable source.
In the page 67 of this book, the origin of al-Saud is explained as:
Muhammad ibn Saud ibn Muqran ibn Markhan ibn Ibrahim ibn Musa ibn Rabi`a ibn Maane'...
All of Wahhabi authors agree that the origin of al-Saud is from Rabi`a ibn Nazar ibn Ma'd ibn Adnan.

Do shia muslims say "Gabriel the traitor" after the prayer ends?

According to #Quran's verses and connected proverbs about, its clear that jews believe that Gabriel betrayed to communicate the prophetic mission, because god ordered him to place the prophecy In continuation of Israel's generations but he did against the order and put that in Ismail's generations, So #Jews know #Gabriel as a traitor.
Quran says that what they say is not the truth and name him as an honest angle in the following
verses :
Shoaraa, verse 193-194
نزَلَ بِهِ الرُّوحُ الْأَمِينُ عَلَى قَلْبِكَ لِتَكُونَ مِنَ الْمُنْذِرِينَ
"Holy spirit(Gabriel) communicated Quran in your heart to be from admonitors"

al-Baqarah , verse 97
*قُلْ مَنْ كَانَ عَدُوًّا لِجِبْرِيلَ فَإِنَّهُ نَزَّلَهُ عَلَى قَلْبِكَ بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ مُصَدِّقًا لِمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ وَهُدًى وَبُشْرَى لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ *
"Say, everyone who has enmity with Gabriel , that great angle communicated quran on your heart with the God's permission"

From the verses above its obvious that Jews have named Gabriel as a punisher angle and the #traitor one.

حدثنا القاسم ، قال : ثنا الحسين ، قال : حدثني حجاج ، عن ابن جريح ، قال : حدثني القاسم بن أبي بزة : أن يهود سألوا النبي ( ص) من صاحبه الذي ينزل عليه بالوحي ، فقال : جبريل . قالوا : فإنه عدو لا يأتي إلا بالحرب والشدة والقتال . فنزل : ( من كان عدوا لجبريل) الآية .
Jews asked #prophet Muhammad , who is the angle communicates you the messages? Prophet #Muhammad replied : Gabriel
They said : Gabriel is an enemy, he wont communicate without war ,then the upper verse has came(baqara 97):

Sunday, 26 April 2015

Was the uprising of Imam Hussein (PBUH) legal or Imam Hussein (PBUH) launched a rebellion against the just caliph, Yazīd ibn Mu‘awiya ibn Abī Sufyān?

In this post, we are going to address this issue from a truly intellectual and narration-based perspective according to some renowned books.
Few points reputable books:
1- Whosoever separates even a little bit from the just ruler, he dies in ignorance.
(Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6, Page 2588, Kitab_al_Fitan)
(Sahih Muslim, Volume 3, Page 1476)

2- Killing anyone who causes discord is allowed.
(Sahih Muslim, Volume 3, Page 1480)

3- Even if the ruler harms your religion, be patient.
(Ibne Abi Sheebah, Volume 6, Page 544; Al-Amwal Al-Ibne Zanjwyah, Volume 1, Page 34)

4- Anyone who rises against the oppressing rulers shall rest in hell.
(Kitab_wa_Rsaail_wa_Fatawa Ibne Teemyah fil Fiqah, Volume 35, Page 12)

Now stating these facts from the above mentioned renowned books (of Ahl-Al-Sunnah),
 we would like to elaborate the incident of #Karbala.

Imam Hussein (PBUH) denied the allegiance to #Yazid and set off for #Kufa. However, he was advised by certain persons (like Abdullah Ibne Umar) to not to do so but Imam #Hussein (PBUH) nevertheless decided to go to Kufa.

Imam Hussein Ibne #Ali (Peace be upon them both) explained about his goal of uprising as it has been narrated.

Imam Hussein realized that the religion had been abandoned.
“Imam Hussein (PBUH) came to these people only when he saw that the religion had been abandoned. So he struggled to re-establish those foundations which his grandfather (the Holy Prophet (PBUH)) had laid. But when they all confronted him and surrounded him, he said: Leave me and let me return!” They didn't accept and said that he must obey the orders of Ibne Zyaad but he preferred death over disgrace as the great men are like that.”

(Al-Tabsrah, Volume 2, Page 14 by Abi Al-Faraj Abd Al-Rahman Ibne Al-Jouzi, died 597 AH, Publishers: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Misri – Dar Al-Kitab Al-Lebanani – Egypt and Lebanon, 1390 AH, 1970 AD, First Edition, Researcher: Mostafa Abd Al-Wahid)

Sunday, 8 March 2015

Who is Son of Man?

My friends , my brother, my sister, know that our saviour Mahdi, is that "Son of Man" in the bible with whom Jesus (peace and blessing be upon him) will come.  The Son of Man can’t be Jesus because Christians believe that Jesus is the “Son of God” and bible says:

You also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. (Luke 12:40)


To know who Mahdi is, watch this short documentary:


source: https://instagram.com/siminasn/

Sunday, 1 March 2015

Almighty God educated His Messenger well and when he had educated him to perfection

Allah the Exalted prepared him for the greatest mission in the history of mankind Imam Sadiq (a.s) said,”Almighty God educated His Messenger well and when he had educated him to perfection,He said:surly you have a great character.Then He entrusted him with the affairs of Islam and the Ummah so that he could educated His servants and namage their affairs” 


We know how the Holy Prophet (s.w.a) lived during his childhold and youth and before his be that.He was so trustworthy that all members of Quraysh and all the Arabs who knew him woud refer to him as “Muhammad the trustworty” .He used to treat people so fairly that when the Arab tribes were fighting over who was more qualifed to return Hajar al-Aswad to its original place in Ka’aba,they decided that he should be the arbiter.This was while he was a young man.This show that he used to treat people fairly and everybody knew this.

Ref:
1. Sireye Payambar
2. Kaafi, v. 1, p. 266
3. Speech of Ayatollah Khamenei 

Source: https://instagram.com/vala_payamdar/

Saturday, 28 February 2015

A tradition regarding the significance of Imamat

A tradition regarding the significance of Imamat


من مات ولم يعرف إمام زمانه مات ميتة جاهلية
"He who dies without recognizing the Imam of his time, would die a pre-Islamic death."[1]
- The Holy Prophet (PBUH)

A tradition upon which both the Shia and the Sunnis agree cannot be ignored, because this agreement shows that the tradition is substantially authentic, though its wording may differ in different reports. Shia usually report this tradition in the following words: "He who dies without recognizing the Imam of his time, would die a pre-Islamic death." These are very serious words, for in the pre-Islamic period people neither believed in the unity of Allah (monotheism) nor in Prophethood. This tradition (hadith) is found in most of the Shia books of traditions including the Kafi which is regarded as the most reliable collection of the Shia traditions.

Friday, 27 February 2015

Rational proving of the Prophet and Imams' impeccable and immunity from sins

To be impeccable and immune from sins is necessary for the Prophet and Imams from intellect point of view. we mention some of them briefly:
Reason of accepting:
We should be able to trust Imams in intellect point of view. If we couldn't trust in saying, deed and writing of Innocent Ones (14 Innocent Ones: the Prophet Muhammad , his daughter, and 12 Imams) and if we suspect at their deeds , authenticity of all religious matters get in question. Then the Innocent Ones should be impeccable and without faults.
Reason of rejection:
If Imams and prophets say something but don't do the same, surely people don't accept that so nobody do divine laws.
Khaje Nasiridin Tusi said at Tajrid al Aghayed: " The Prophet should be innocent and impeccable so people trust them and to trust is the purpose of prophetic mission." [Kashf al Morad fi Tajrid al Eteghad, p.471]



According to the 59s verse of Surah Al-Nessa:

O you who have faith! Obey Allah and obey the Apostle and those vested with authority among you. And if you dispute concerning anything, refer it to Allah and the Apostle, if you have faith in Allah and the Last Day. That is better and more favorable in outcome. [Al-Nessa (Women), 4:59]

Absolute obedience of Imamas is mandatory and God has ordered us to do so just like he has ordered us to obey himself and his messenger.

Now regarding this theory the question is “If The Prophet and Imamas are not sinless and immaculate, would it be mandatory to follow them in every aspect?”

Thursday, 26 February 2015

And to Dawood (David) we gave Sulaiman (Solomon), most excellent the servant, surly he was frequent in returning (to Allah)

And to Dawood (David) we gave Sulaiman (Solomon), most excellent the servant, surly he was frequent in returning (to Allah)...

 
In my opinion, one of the lovely keywords in the chapter SAD (the letter SAD) of the Holy Quran is the word "Awab".
When God in this chapter- with that special tone- three or four times- refers to his good servants- David and Solomon- with this adjective; "Awab".
Meaning someone who frequently returns to God. Always facing towards him.
Its really sweet when God describes a servant like this: "Most excellent the servant, surly he was frequent in returning (to Allah)"

...And to Dawood (David) we gave Sulaiman (Solomon), most excellent the servant, surly he was frequent in returning (to Allah)

Holy Quran 38:30

T:Alireza Rezaei
============================
#Theism #Islam #Quran

Friday, 23 January 2015

A Letter To the Youth in Europe and North America

In the name of God, the Beneficent the Merciful


To the Youth in Europe and North America,

The recent events in France and similar ones in some other Western countries have convinced me to directly talk to you about them. I am addressing you, [the youth], not because I overlook your parents, rather it is because the future of your nations and countries will be in your hands; and also I find that the sense of quest for truth is more vigorous and attentive in your hearts.

I don’t address your politicians and statesmen either in this writing because I believe that they have consciously separated the route of politics from the path of righteousness and truth.

I would like to talk to you about Islam, particularly the image that is presented to you as Islam. Many attempts have been made over the past two decades, almost since the disintegration of the Soviet Union, to place this great religion in the seat of a horrifying enemy. The provocation of a feeling of horror and hatred and its utilization has unfortunately a long record in the political history of the West.

Here, I don’t want to deal with the different phobias with which the Western nations have thus far been indoctrinated. A cursory review of recent critical studies of history would bring home to you the fact that the Western governments’ insincere and hypocritical treatment of other nations and cultures has been censured in new historiographies.

The histories of the United States and Europe are ashamed of slavery, embarrassed by the colonial period and chagrined at the oppression of people of color and non-Christians. Your researchers and historians are deeply ashamed of the bloodsheds wrought in the name of religion between the Catholics and Protestants or in the name of nationality and ethnicity during the First and Second World Wars. This approach is admirable.

By mentioning a fraction of this long list, I don’t want to reproach history; rather I would like you to ask your intellectuals as to why the public conscience in the West awakens and comes to its senses after a delay of several decades or centuries. Why should the revision of collective conscience apply to the distant past and not to the current problems? Why is it that attempts are made to prevent public awareness regarding an important issue such as the treatment of Islamic culture and thought?

You know well that humiliation and spreading hatred and illusionary fear of the “other” have been the common base of all those oppressive profiteers. Now, I would like you to ask yourself why the old policy of spreading “phobia” and hatred has targeted Islam and Muslims with an unprecedented intensity. Why does the power structure in the world want Islamic thought to be marginalized and remain latent? What concepts and values in Islam disturb the programs of the super powers and what interests are safeguarded in the shadow of distorting the image of Islam? Hence, my first request is: Study and research the incentives behind this widespread tarnishing of the image of Islam.

My second request is that in reaction to the flood of prejudgments and disinformation campaigns, try to gain a direct and firsthand knowledge of this religion. The right logic requires that you understand the nature and essence of what they are frightening you about and want you to keep away from.

I don’t insist that you accept my reading or any other reading of Islam. What I want to say is: Don’t allow this dynamic and effective reality in today’s world to be introduced to you through resentments and prejudices. Don’t allow them to hypocritically introduce their own recruited terrorists as representatives of Islam.

Receive knowledge of Islam from its primary and original sources. Gain information about Islam through the Qur’an and the life of its great Prophet. I would like to ask you whether you have directly read the Qur’an of the Muslims. Have you studied the teachings of the Prophet of Islam and his humane, ethical doctrines? Have you ever received the message of Islam from any sources other than the media?

Have you ever asked yourself how and on the basis of which values has Islam established the greatest scientific and intellectual civilization of the world and raised the most distinguished scientists and intellectuals throughout several centuries?

I would like you not to allow the derogatory and offensive image-buildings to create an emotional gulf between you and the reality, taking away the possibility of an impartial judgment from you. Today, the communication media have removed the geographical borders. Hence, don’t allow them to besiege you within fabricated and mental borders.

Although no one can individually fill the created gaps, each one of you can construct a bridge of thought and fairness over the gaps to illuminate yourself and your surrounding environment. While this preplanned challenge between Islam and you, the youth, is undesirable, it can raise new questions in your curious and inquiring minds. Attempts to find answers to these questions will provide you with an appropriate opportunity to discover new truths.

Therefore, don’t miss the opportunity to gain proper, correct and unbiased understanding of Islam so that hopefully, due to your sense of responsibility toward the truth, future generations would write the history of this current interaction between Islam and the West with a clearer conscience and lesser resentment.

Seyyed Ali Khamenei
21st Jan. 2015

twitter.com/khamenei_ir
fb.com/www.Khamenei.ir 

Friday, 17 October 2014

The damage of a corrupt mullah from Imam Khomeini point of view


October 12, 1979
The damage Islam sustains at the hands of a corrupt mullah is greater than that inflicted by Muhammad-Rida (The king of Iran by the time)! There are some traditions saying, men of hell are bothered by the fetid smell of the corrupt clerics. In this world the people are also bothered by their fetid smell. We do not support the turban; we support Islam. If Islam is with everyone, he will be dignified. Being treacherous to the precepts of Islam on behalf of a cleric is worse than a non-cleric because the former is more harmful than others. There is no purpose behind establishing these courts and it makes no difference if they want to change them into the common public courts.

Thursday, 2 October 2014

Syrian rebel eats human flesh along with reciting 'Allah o Akbar' (God is great)

Syrian rebel eats human flesh along with reciting 'Allah o Akbar' (God is great).
Are they really Muslims or there is something wrong with this satanic gesture?







Let's see what Islam says about eating human flesh.

Quran says:

[5:1]- believers, fulfill your obligations. it is lawful for you (to eat the flesh of) the beast among cattle other than that which is recited to you, hunting is forbidden while you are on pilgrimage. allah decrees what he will.

[5:3]- you are forbidden (to consume) the dead, blood and the flesh of swine; also flesh dedicated to any other than allah, the flesh of strangled (animals) and of those beaten, that which is killed by falling, gored to death, mangled by beasts of prey, unless you find it (still alive) and slaughter it; also of animals sacrificed on stones (to idols)...

[16:115]- these things alone he has forbidden to you: what is already dead, blood, the flesh of swine, what has been offeredup to other than allah. but to whoever is forced to eat any of these, neither desiring nor wanting to transgress, allah is forgiving, merciful.

[2:173]- he has forbidden you the dead, blood, and the flesh of swine, also that which is invoked to other than allah. but whoever is constrained (to eat) any of these, not intending to sin or transgress, incurs no guilt. allah is forgiving and the most merciful.

As it can be vividly seen, in the first vessel the allowed flesh is mentioned, there is no human one there. However, it was pretty obvious, but we want to show in the major reference (i.e. Quran). In the other listed vessels, it is explicitly ordered that it is forbidden to eat flesh of an already dead animal. Even for allowed animals, for example cow, it is forbidden to eat its flesh if you find it dead. Therefore, it is obviously forbidden to eat human flesh and if somebody does it, he/she commits a big sin no matter who is he/she and you can't consider them as a Muslim.

You can download the clear clip from this link: http://zohur12.persiangig.com/video/z6VA.mp4/download?d2aa

PS: The video clip is really disgusting, please if you can't watch it, do not download it.